Literature analysis Fantastic Four war zone

1)  What drew me to this book is that i like the movie.  I expected to read what i saw in the movies but with more detail.
2)  What kept me reading past the past ten pages was that i was interested to see what would happen.
3)  I don't have any reading habits because i don't read often.

1)  The plot of the novel is that there are four friends who travel into space and have their genes mutated and later each have their own superpower.  One becomes a big strong rock monster, One turns to fire and flies, One becomes really stretchy, And the other 1 becomes invisible. But they want to reverse the affects. DR .Doom doesn't like that and will do anything to stop them.
2)  I think the theme is that if you stick together you can do more than by being alone and selfish.
3) The authors tone is serious.

1)" Her hair was long and golden." " He became as hot as the sun and was able to reach the stars"
2)  The authors tone does not change.
3)  He is flat because he does not change.
4) I felt like i met characters because of their superpowers not being real.

Literature analysis the cat in the hat comes back

1)  What drew me to this book is that I like Dr. Suess.  I expected a book with a lot of rhyming and pictures.
2)  What kept me reading is the comedy.
3)  I don't really have any reading habits because i don't read often.

1)The book is about how the cat wants to hang out with the little kids Sally and her brother while their mother is gone but  the cat makes a big mess and tries to clean it up before she comes back but uses her favorite dress and the kids want him gone.
2)The theme of the book is that no matter what h append u can do something if u try really hard.
3)The tone is humorous. "but i like to eat cake laughed the cat"

1)"Hardworking cat" "kids that liked to play tricks"
2)no the authors diction or syntax does not change.
3)The character is dynamic because he changes throughout the story in the beginning he just likes to play jokes on people and didn't care about anyone else but at the end he becomes good and wants to make up for what he did wrong.
4) after this i felt like i read a character.

Literature Analysis F 451

1) What drew me to this book was the unusual story of a fireman starting fires.
2) What kept me reading past the first 10 pages was that i had to read the book to get a good grade.
3)I do not usually read but when I have to read I usually read what we are assigned or review before a test.

1) The plot of the book is that there are fireman who are brainwashed to start fires and to burn all the books they can because they are considered bad and the main Character Montag starts questioning if he really wants to be what he is but he decided he didn't so he turns on them and has to hide the books he has. In the end he ends up killing his boss and evading the police
2) the theme is self determination
3)the authors tone toward the story was dark
1)Direct characterization= clerice said I'm 17 and I'm crazy when asked her age
indirect =her face was slender and milk white. usually when the author uses direct characterization it stays with me more than indirect characterization
2)I think the authors syntax and diction changes when he talks about montage because montage usually thinks dark things so that reflects the authors tone.
3) the character is dynamic because he changes throughout the story from good to bad.
4)After the book i did fell that i met a character because of how good he was described throughout the story.